Q&A: Forrester's Chenxi Wang discusses cloud compliance
Date: Sep 24, 2010While some organizations have been eagerly exploring the potential IT cost savings that cloud computing offers, excitement has been tempered by the compliance challenges that cloud services bring.
In this interview at the recent Forrester Research Security Forum 2010, Chenxi Wang, principal analyst with Forrester, discusses her recent research report, "Compliance with Clouds: Caveat Emptor" and the issues involved with maintaining compliance with PCI, SOX and HIPAA and using cloud-based services.
Read the full text transcript from this video below. Please note the full transcript is for reference only and may include limited inaccuracies. To suggest a transcript correction, contact editor@searchsecurity.com.
Q&A: Forrester's Chenxi Wang discusses cloud compliance
Eric Parizo: Chenxi Wang, Principal Analyst at
Forrester
Research. Thank you so much for your time
today.
Chenxi Wang: Thank you.
Eric Parizo: First question for you. In your recent
Forrester
Research report, 'Compliance with Clouds: Caveat
Emptor,'
you write, 'Leveraging the benefits of the cloud
and
maintaining compliance can be at
odds.'
Chenxi Wang: Right.
Eric Parizo: Is that an understatement?
Chenxi Wang: No, I think it is an accurate statement.
They do not
necessarily have to be at odds, but they can be at
odds with
each other.
Eric Parizo: To debunk the fight out there, is it
possible for an
enterprise to allow its data to live in externally
hosting
environment outside of its direct control without
necessarily
putting its compliance program in
jeopardy?
Chenxi Wang: It is possible, yes.
Eric Parizo: Why is that?
Chenxi Wang: If you are able to gain enough visibility of
the controls
in a hosting provider or a cloud provider is during
the inside of an
infrastructure, and if you are able to understand
whether those
level of controls are sufficient for your compliance
needs, and
if you can evaluate that, then you can say whether
this meets my
compliance needs or not. There could be cases that it
does meet
your compliance needs.
Eric Parizo: Experts generalize classify cloud-based
services into
three platforms: platform services, infrastructure
services, and
application services. Does each type uniquely affect
compliance
efforts?
Chenxi Wang: They do.
Eric Parizo: How so?
Chenxi Wang: At each level of
infrastructure-as-a-service, the user
of the service would have more control over the
configuration of the
VM and the application that is handling the data, is
typically
under the control of the user. When you go up the
stack, when
you go to application service which is SaaS, the user
has very
little control because the application lives in the
Cloud; the
application is the IP of the service provider versus
the user.
So you go up the stack from infrastructure service
to
application service, the user has less control,
hence, you will
have to trust your provider even more, so they have
different
implications.
Eric Parizo: Your report specifically addresses cloud
compliance with
PCI, GSS, HIPAA, SOX, a couple of other compliance
mandates. In
brief, what are the top standard specific cloud
compliance
issues that stand out?
Chenxi Wang: The first issue is am I going to be
compliant when I
contract with this cloud provider? That is the
ultimate question. If you
are non-compliant, then you have a decision to make.
Do I still
want to go with cloud? Maybe not, maybe I should just
walk away
and do whatever I am doing now and continue to do
that, or if
your business really wants to go to the cloud,
leveraging the
benefits of the cloud, yet it poses a risk to your
compliance
requirements, so what do you do? As an IT guy, maybe
you should
look to alternative controls that you can do
independent of the
cloud provider, independent of the cloud
infrastructure so that
you can enable your business to use a cloud but still
meet your
compliance requirements.
For instance, if the business wants to store certain
regulated
data in the cloud and leveraging the storage as
service, you can
pre-encrypt the data if it is PHI or PII regulated.
You can pre-
encrypt the data, hold on to the key, and put the
data in the
cloud. That will enable you, in some scenarios, to
actually use
the cloud and meet your compliance requirements. That
is where
the examination has to fall.
Eric Parizo: When an enterprise considers a cloud vendor
or provider,
are there signs to look for or questions to ask to
ensure the
vendor provider will help support that company's
compliance and
issues?
Chenxi Wang: Yes. Typically, certain providers are really
conscientious
about security issues, and those are the providers
that you want
to go with, obviously, aside from the functionality
evaluation.
When you go talk to those providers who really
understand
security questions and also advise that the security
criteria
that you thought, in fact, some of them will even
say, 'Have you
thought about this? Have you thought about this,'
because they
have dealt with a lot of customers. They know what
the typical
security requirements are. Also, some providers have
gone
through fairly stringent external
evaluations.
For instance, ISO 27001 is a pretty stringent
standards
evaluation. So if they have gone through that, which
is
information security controls, where you can look at
all the
reports and you have some level of sense of how well
they do
certain of these operational controls. The third is
signs of a
good Cloud provider, they have good reference
accounts, people
in your industry, people who are your peers, people
who are
maybe, bigger than you, who have similar security,
privacy, and
compliance requirements are using this Cloud
provider. It is not
100% true that these other peers have gone through
the
compliance questionnaire, but maybe they have done,
at least,
some level of evaluations. Some good reference
accounts is
another good sign that this Cloud provider may be, at
least
security aware, security
conscientious.
Eric Parizo: I would imagine that is a big red flag if an
organization
provider will not offer those sorts of reference
customers.
Chenxi Wang: Yes. I do not know about whether that is a
red flag, per se.
When you do have good reference customers, it is a
good sign,
but without it sometimes could mean they do have
those
customers, but those customers do not consent that
they be used
publicly for those reasons. It is not necessarily a
red flag,
but it is certainly not a positive
sign.
Eric Parizo: For companies that are farther down the road
and have
already decided on a provider and/or perhaps thinking
about
negotiating a potential contract with a cloud
services provider,
what are some key examples of elements that need to
be in that
contract?
Chenxi Wang: There is a long list of things . . .
Eric Parizo: What are the highlights?
Chenxi Wang: That need to be in that contract. The
highlights would
be, what type of visibility do I have as a user?
Would I get to
see, would I know if something goes wrong? What
happens with the
contract ends, the end of contract support, or can I
move my
data that lives in your cloud very easily to a
different
provider? Are you going to package up my data in some
way that I
can easily move it? Are you going to erase my data,
all the
copies, from your infrastructure? Are you going to be
able to
give me any service level guarantees of availability
and how
available are your services going to be, those
performance
levels, those key performance indexes that you want
to put in
the contract? What happens if the provider fails to
meet the
service level, performance level? Is there going to
be any
recourse action that I can take in the form of maybe,
service
credit or an early exit from the
contract?
All of these things have to be put in. End of contract.
What
happens if something goes wrong? How do I tell if
things are
going right? Let us see, what are the other
highlights? I think
we covered most of it.
Eric Parizo: Finally, looking forward, over the next
three to five
years, how do you see Cloud services and the
enterprises' use of
cloud services evolving? Are there any
security-related or
compliance-related issues on the horizon that you see
as
potentially causing more trouble?
Chenxi Wang: I do not know potentially causing more
trouble, but I
think we are definitely going to see more providers
will use security
compliance as a differentiator. In the early stage of
the
industry, you are differentiating on what services
you offer,
the functionality you provide, but when there are
more and more
people coming into the industry sector, your
differentiation is
going to diminish, so you differentiate on the other
abilities.
Things like how secure is my service? How much
protection I can
provide for your data, and whether I can meet your
compliance
requirements. We expect to see more and more
companies will be
offering compliance-ready infrastructure and services
so users
will have more places to go, or even to outsource
regulated data
and regulated work requirements.
I think the landscape will change in the way that it
is
beneficial to users versus causing more problems.
Companies are
also becoming more sophisticated about using the
cloud. I am
aware of a number of large organizations, they now
have
established a central governance of cloud usage,
instead of some
guy in some business department decides to user a
credit card
and go to Amazon and outsource some work loads, now
you have to
go through an internal approval process. That
approval process
will actually vet the vendor, whether this is a good
cloud
provider to use versus the other one. The process is
getting a
little bit more mature and more sophisticated. I
think both
ends, from the provider and the user end, we are
seeing a
matured increase.
Eric Parizo: Almost like a more conservative cloud
governance effort
internally, if you will.
Chenxi Wang: Yes. I hate to use cloud governance, because
I think it is a
really broad term, but yes.
Eric Parizo: All right. Very good. That is a positive note to end on.
Chenxi Wang: That is a very positive note.
Eric Parizo: Chenxi Wang, Principal Analyst at Forrester
Research.
Thank you so much.
Cloud Computing Strategies for the CIO